The neobank race is heating up. Based on latest metrics – customers, revenue, profitability, and valuation – each player is taking a distinct path. Letโs see how they compare.
an article written by Panagiotis Kriaris, Director – Head Of Business & Corporate Development at Unzer.
๐น ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ป๐ธ leads in customers (114M), revenue ($11B), and pre-tax profit ($2.2B). With a valuation of $65B and efficient monetization ($96 Average Revenue per User – ARPU), it’s the most balanced model at scale.
๐น ๐๐ฎ๐๐ต ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ posts the highest revenue ($16.2B) and ARPU ($306), reflecting strong monetization through Bitcoin and services. But its metrics blend into Blockโs broader business, limiting standalone clarity.
๐น ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐น๐๐ has scaled fast (50M users, $4B revenue), with solid profitability ($1.4B) and a $45B valuation. Its $80 ARPU and 11.2ร EV/revenue show strong expectations baked in.
๐น ๐ช๐ถ๐๐ฒ keeps margins healthy ($1.4B revenue, $0.6B profit) on just 13M users, with best-in-class ARPU ($111). At a $12B valuation, itโs viewed as efficient, but niche.
๐น ๐ฆ๐ผ๐๐ถ stands out for diversification (banking + investing) and posts $2.6B revenue. Yet despite profitability, its high EV/user (1,324ร) may reflect overvaluation.
๐น ๐๐ต๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ shows solid revenue ($1.7B) but remains unprofitable. Its high ARPU ($243) suggests pricing power, but a $21B valuation with no profit raises some questions.
๐น ๐ก๐ฎ๐ฒ lags in scale (5M users) and revenue ($0.6B), with no profit. Despite this, its $3B valuation and $100 ARPU hint at regional strength but limited breakout potential.
๐๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐: scale alone isnโt enough. The most valuable neobanks combine user growth, strong ARPU, and clear profit paths. As investors have shifted focus from growth at all costs to fundamentals, long-term sustainability will define the next generation of winners.
Banking 4.0 – „how was the experience for you”
„To be honest I think that Sinaia, your conference, is much better then Davos.”
Many more interesting quotes in the video below: